Cases 1 - 10 of 2,074
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Alto Asset Company 4, LLC v. Davis
as 1:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
Alto Asset Company 4, LLC
Defendant:
Lakaii Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moultrie v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01922
Plaintiff:
Latoya Shanah Moultrie
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, City of Smyrna Police Department, Officer T. Cooper and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis Jr. v. Transdev Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
John H. Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Transdev Services Inc., Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc., Old Republic Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wallace and Sylvia Wallace
Defendant:
Kenneth Davis and Emily Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAVIS v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVIS
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, B & B TRANSPORT INC, JOE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
