Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Leroy Ingram v. Eric Deem, et al
as 15-10601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC T. DEEM, Detective, PAUL L. HOWARD, District Attorney and WOODROW BLUE, Chief of Police
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Pam Jones, Damon Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Beard, Pam Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Blue
as 1:2014cv02879
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ingram
Defendant:
Eric T. Deem, Paul L. Howard and Woodrow Blue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latwahn McElroy v. Gustafson, et al
as 14-16515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Defendant - Appellee:
GUSTAFSON, Correctional Officer, High Desert State Prison, T. VIRGA, Warden, ROBERTSON, Physician Assisstant, High Desert State Prison and others
Keith Allen Lewis,Sr. v. Andrew Deems, et al
as 4:2014cv03324
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew Deems , Elena Tootell , Kevin Chappell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Deem et al
as 1:2014cv02062
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ingram
Defendant:
Eric T. Deem, Woodrow Blue and Paul L. Howard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Zamora et al
as 3:2014cv01495
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Hamilton
Defendant:
L. D. Zamora, J. Clark Kelso, Colleen Shoopman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2013cv02659
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chaney, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Butte , Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Butte, Jerry W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haden v. Chapelle
as 4:2013cv05512
Plaintiff:
Steven Haden
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Andrew Deems, J. DeLacruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
