Cases 21 - 30 of 127
FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC. et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01751
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC. , HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM , HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01573
Plaintiff:
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL , BANNER HEART HOSPITAL , BANNER BAYWOOD MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
LA CHEIM SCHOOL, INC. v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01540
Plaintiff:
LA CHEIM SCHOOL, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01471
Plaintiff:
BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. , CAREGROUP, INC., and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ARIA HEALTH et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
ARIA HEALTH , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Cooley v. Price
as 2:2017cv12229
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price
Plaintiff:
Warren W. Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01234
Plaintiff:
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Shudnow v. Price
as 1:2017cv04664
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Shudnow
Defendant:
Thomas E Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01134
Plaintiff:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , BAYSTATE MARY LANE HOSPITAL CORPORATION , BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Robie v. Price et al
as 2:2017cv03089
Plaintiff:
E. Michael Robie
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price and Palmetto GBA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
