Cases 21 - 30 of 3,732
Smith v. Axonics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Axonics, Inc., Michael H. Carrel, Raymond W. Cohen and others
Gurewitz v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gurewitz
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
LEJILEX et al v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
LEJILEX and Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas
Defendant:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric R. Werner, Gary Gensler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Brian Davis, et al v. Lucinda Baier, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DAVIS, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., ROBERT BAZINET, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and BRIAN BICKETT, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Defendant:
LUCINDA M. BAIER, T. ANDREW SMITH, STEVEN E. SWAIN and others
Marselis v. Fox Factory Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Ryan Marselis
Defendant:
Fox Factory Holding Corp., Michael C. Dennison, Dennis C. Schemm and others
Woodbury v. Callon Petroleum Company et al
as 1:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Zachary Woodbury
Defendant:
Callon Petroleum Company, Matthew R. Bob, Joseph C. Gatto, Jr. and others
Andrew Roth v. Austin Russell, et al
as 24-10448
Plaintiff:
ANDREW E. ROTH
Defendant:
AUSTIN RUSSELL and LUMINAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Roth v. CK Amarillo LP et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Andrew E. Roth
Defendant:
CK Amarillo LP, CK Amarillo GP, LLC, Certares Opportunities LLC and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
