Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,277
Watson v. Optum Headquarters et al
as 6:2024cv01022
Plaintiff: Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant: Optum Headquarters, Heather Ciafrocco, Christ Zaetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Boch et al
as 6:2024cv01023
Plaintiff: Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant: Gerald W. Boch and United States Department of Veterans Affairs, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kinch v. Todd
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Stacy Kinch and Stacy E. Kinch
Defendant: Zachary Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Paisley et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Joshua E. Davis
Defendant: Brian Paisley, Brian (I) Paisley, Brian Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. West Jordan City et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Sheri Meyer
Defendant: West Jordan City, Nolan Butler, Ericka Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff: ADAM STREGE
Defendant: GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Watson v. Ebert, et al
as 24-3007
Plaintiff: CARL E. WATSON
Defendant: SHERYL A. EBERT and VETERANS EVALUATION SERVICES
Villecco v. Barela, et al
as 24-1008
Plaintiff: MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant: JOSEPH M. BARELA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment and PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, in his official capacity as Director of the Division of Unemployment Insurance
Villecco v. Spesshardt
as 24-1004
Plaintiff: MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant: PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?