Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Jackson v. Shoshone-Bannock Correctional Facility, et al.
as 4:2021cv00145
Defendant:
K Mountainsheep, E Hernandez, Dann Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dancier Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bosse v. Mr. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Mr. Hansen, Mrs. Starr, Mrs. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Bosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grist v. Christenson
as 1:2021cv00086
Respondent:
Christenson
Petitioner:
Harold E Grist, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Twin Falls County Jail
as 1:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Twin Falls County Jail
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. City of Twin Falls County et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Respondent:
City of Twin Falls County and Idaho Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sileoni v. Thomson et al
as 1:2020cv00502
Defendant:
C/O Flower, David E. Dietz, Jay Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Idaho Dept of Corections, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson and Jason Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Twin Falls City Idaho, et al.
as 1:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Twinn Falls County Sherriffs Dept, Justin Cyr, Twinn Falls City Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Hummer et al
as 1:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Alex E. Muir, Det. Schweitz, Warden Vitalabos and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Tyler Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Zachary Tyler Allen
Respondent:
State of Idaho, Brad Little, Idaho Attorney Genrell and others
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Sgt Taylor Wilson, Lt. Hust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
