Cases 21 - 30 of 979
Wilson v. United States Of America
as 3:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Irvin E. Coleman and Lord Divine Allah
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pryor v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mr. Clint Davis and Mr. Ross Maurice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Simoplous
as 7:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Simoplous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suchomelly v. Jennings et al
as 2:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Suchomelly
Defendant:
Sgt. Jennings and PRJ Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Erick Brown, Joshua M. Branch, Angela D. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
L.M. et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Graham, Michelle Smith, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jervod Simmons
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, Lt. K. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00687
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
