Cases 21 - 30 of 6,598
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaffer et al v. General Security National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Sheilah E Shaffer and William Shaffer
Defendant:
General Security National Insurance Company and Goosehead Ins. Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
United States v. Beck
as 24-7036
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSES RIC-E BECK, AKA Ricky
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santiago v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Isaiah E Santiago
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Gurewitz v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gurewitz
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Webb, et al
as 24-1096
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
DAVID E. WEBB, NICHOLAS T. WEBB, as trustee of the spirit mtn trust dated April 5, 2007 and individually, PARK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
