Cases 21 - 30 of 2,727
Wood v. Pozeg et al
as 7:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Defendant:
Michael Pozeg, Larry Meadows, J. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVLIN v. Wormuth
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL A DEVLIN
Defendant:
HON Christine E Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Earhart
as 7:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Sean Hodge
Defendant:
Chief of Housing E. Earhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Saghir et al
as 7:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Cheryl E. Perry
Defendant:
Mohamed Ahmedou Saghir and Al Express Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
