Cases 31 - 40 of 31,649
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Uquiche-Nahui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2960
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR UQUICHE-NAHUI, MIRIAM JUDITH GONZALES-BONIFACIO and J. E. U.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03819
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03820
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Allen v. O'Malley
as 24-2927
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hanover Insurance Company v. Shively
as 9:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas E. Shively
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
