Cases 41 - 50 of 2,840
BREEZEE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
JASON M BREEZEE, KYLE M. BUMP, CHRISTOPHER L. BURNHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HINES v. FARRINGTON
as 1:2023cv03397
Plaintiff:
DASHON HINES
Defendant:
DANIEL E. FARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DUFFIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03321
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. DUFFIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUISE WOOD FLANAGAN, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edward M.R., et al v. DC
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward M.R., by and through his Parents, T. R.-M. and E. M.
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NEELON
as 1:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GAIL E NEELON and GAIL E. NEELON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FRANCIS v. ANONYMOUS et al
as 1:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
MILDRED E. FRANCIS
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. B Q E INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
B Q E INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
