Cases 41 - 50 of 2,840
DUFFIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03321
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. DUFFIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUISE WOOD FLANAGAN, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward M.R., et al v. DC
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward M.R., by and through his Parents, T. R.-M. and E. M.
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia
JACKSON v. WORMUTH
as 1:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M JACKSON and STEVEN M. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Francisco Martinez v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Francisco E. Martinez
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, National Security Agency, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. B Q E INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
B Q E INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FRANCIS v. ANONYMOUS et al
as 1:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
MILDRED E. FRANCIS
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HINES v. FARRINGTON
as 1:2023cv03397
Plaintiff:
DASHON HINES
Defendant:
DANIEL E. FARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2023cv03118
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, R.K. DELMAR, CAWANA PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
