Cases 41 - 50 of 1,399
Edmonds v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Edmonds
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutton v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Donna Dutton
Defendant:
Hon. Jimmy Shaffer, Hon. R. Michael Sullivan, Hon. Jeff S. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland v. USA
as 5:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Jonathan E. Garland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Smith
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. USA
as 5:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Katherine E. Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taken Alive v. USA
as 6:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Taken Alive, Jr
Respondent:
USA and J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Westmoreland et al
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Logan R. Westmoreland and Joseph E. Zupancic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Miniard v. LFUCG Division Code Enforcement et al
as 5:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matt E Miniard
Defendant:
LFUCG Division Code Enforcement, Alex Olszowy, Evan Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
