Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Beers v. Hopkins, et al
as 8:1998cv00470
Plaintiff:
Chad Allen Beers
Defendant:
John Cherry, Howard Clark, Unknown Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nebraska Department of Labor v. Gardner
as 8:2015mc00050
Defendant:
Sean E. Gardner
Plaintiff:
Nebraska Department of Labor
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
USA v. $64317.59 US Curr
as 8:1990cv00486
Defendant:
$64,317.59 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Ignacio E. Chavez, Jesus Chavez, Fuentes and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Henderson v. Allen et al
as 4:2015cv03040
Defendant:
Hon. Kristine Cook Graham, et. al., Cindy Adams, Marty Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 8:1984cv00803
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Stanley E. Morris, United States Marshal's Service for the District of Nebraska and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Stehlik
as 8:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
James G. Fitl and Galen E. Stehlik
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
United States of America v. Fox
as 4:2014mc03026
Respondent:
George E. Fox
202) 514-6770 (fax:
United States of America
Lang v. Herrick et al
as 4:2014mc03010
Debtor:
Hollen D. Herrick
Defendant:
Jennifer E. Herrick
Plaintiff:
Catherine D. Lang
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
