Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Johnson v. Farley
as 4:2014cv00867
Petitioner:
Ervin EJ Johnson
Respondent:
Robert L. Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Abrams et al v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams , Angela Alle , John Amos and others
Defendant:
Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Walhof et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp24113
Plaintiff:
Ervin D. Walhof and Sandra G. Walhof
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lehmann et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23179
Plaintiff:
Janice Lehmann and Ervin Lehmann
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ervin v. Bradshaw
as 1:2012cv00739
Petitioner:
James D. Ervin
Respondent:
Margaret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kaeser v. GE Healtcare Inc et al
as 1:2012gd50005
Plaintiff:
Ervin L Kaeser
Defendant:
GE Healtcare Inc and GE Healthcare AS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21927
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ervin and Louis Ervin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ervin et al v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21767
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ervin and Louis Ervin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. , DePuy Inc., , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
