Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodas v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rodas
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Levon Allen, Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brogdon v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv05835
Plaintiff:
Craig Bruce Brogdon and Joseph F Dyson
Defendant:
Unknown, Ellen McElyea, Susan Treadaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richmond County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Jones
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff Department and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Ashley
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tom F. Fields, III
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Tom F. Fields, III
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Investigator Nancy A. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Gillis
as 2:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Robert F. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Sean Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
