Cases 1 - 10 of 254
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Galindo Espitia v. McLaren Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galindo Espitia
Defendant:
McLaren Automotive, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
(PC) Sykes v. Galindo et al
as 1:2023cv01770
Plaintiff:
Troy Sykes
Defendant:
Galindo, Vasquez, Gasca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Chau et al v. Rosario Galindo et al
as 2:2023cv09724
Plaintiff:
Jack Chau and Shung Lui
Defendant:
Rosario Galindo, Jaime Guijarro, Aldo Rivers and others
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jack Chau et al v. Rosario Galindo et al
as 2:2023cv08842
Plaintiff:
Jack Chau and Shung Lui
Defendant:
Rosario Galindo, Jaime Guijarro, Edwin Olivares and others
Interested Party:
Charley Moon
(PS) Galindo v. Goehrig et al
as 2:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
Donald Antonio Galindo
Defendant:
Gregory P Goehrig, Jaime Lao Patena, Eric Heese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
