Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gipson v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Artis Gipson
Defendant:
David Shinn, D.W. Higginson, Jorge H Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04566
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Dane Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01851
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gipson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
Cleran Gipson and Regina Gipson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01021
Plaintiff:
Michael Gipson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gipson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv00389
Petitioner:
Artis Gipson
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gipson et al v. Pinal County et al
as 2:2009cv00314
Plaintiff:
Varick Gipson, Alonzo Alexander, Avon Skinner and others
Defendant:
Pinal County, James P. Walsh, Judy Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gipson v. Maricopa County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2007cv02259
Petitioner:
Dawan Kalid Gipson
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Joe Arpaio and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gipson v. Maricopa County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2007cv02261
Petitioner:
Dawan Kalid Gipson
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Joe Arpaio and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
