Cases 31 - 40 of 148
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.176 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2021cv00002
Defendant:
JUANA R. BRISENO, Ameida Salinas, Starr County Tax Assessor-Collector, ESTELLA R. MORENO and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Julio Esquibel-Segovia, et al v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-60890
Petitioner:
Conzuelo Mejia-Guillen, Daniela Sarahi Esquibel-Mejia, Yolani Jazmin Esquibel-Mejia and others
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Eleno Guillen-Morales
as 20-50749
Defendant / Appellant:
Eleno Guillen-Morales
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Hercules v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60658
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Hercules, also known as Jose Hercules Guillen
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General
Guillen v. lasto et al
as 4:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Pat's Towing, Inc. and lester lasto
Plaintiff:
Jose Guillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jose Guillen Cedio v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60013
Petitioner:
JOSE IRRAEL GUILLEN CEDIO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fernando Martinez, et al v. Mike Pompeo, Secretary
as 19-41041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETICIA GUILLEN ONTIVEROS, FERNANDO MARTINEZ and S.L.G.O., a Minor, by and through her Mother, Leticia Guillen Ontiveros
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE POMPEO, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diamondopoulous-Guillen v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13486
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juanita Diamondopoulous-Guillen and Juanita Diamondopoulos-Guillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
