Cases 21 - 30 of 136
HOLDEN v. Capital et al
as 2:2021cv05645
Plaintiff:
HANNAH HOLDEN
Defendant:
CAG CORPORATION doing business as CAG TRUCK CAPITAL and CHRISTOPHER A. GRIVAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KROCKER et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2021cv05376
Petitioner:
RYAN ANDREW KROCKER and HANNAH ELIZABETH KROCKER
Respondent:
ANTONY BLINKEN and RENA BITTER
Plaintiff:
RYAN KROCKER and HANNAH KROCKER
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SCHLASINGER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04681
Plaintiff:
LARRY SCHLASINGER and HANNAH SCHLASINGER
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HERNANDEZ et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 2:2021cv00499
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Plaintiff:
HANNAH HERNANDEZ and MIGUEL HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. TOSKI et al
as 2:2020cv01720
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
ZACHARY KODRIC, ROBERT SMITH, AMBER COFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PHINISEE v. GRAHAM-PARKER et al
as 2:2020cv05279
Plaintiff:
RASHEENA PHINISEE
Defendant:
AVANI SHAH, HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING NETWORK-THE HEALTH ANNEX and others
Petitioner:
KAI PITTMAN, SUSAN ENGLES, LAURA OPPENHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
BENES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00286
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
HANNAH NICOLE BENES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
