Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Williams v. Union Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2013cv01504
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution, R. E. Manning, W. L. Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prohaska et al
as 3:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Maria Williams
Defendant:
Christopher J. Prohaska, Christopher E. Kelsey, Robert Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oakley v. J. P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 9:2012cv80702
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Oakley
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase & Co. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yearby v. Levasseur et al
as 3:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
Toric Lavern Yearby
Defendant:
Jon M. Levasseur, M. Kennedy, Garrett L. Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Manning et al
as 3:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
Larry Larenza Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
R. E. Manning, J. P. Corely, John Doe Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. J P Morgan Chase's Disability Leave Policy
as 8:2010cv02220
Plaintiff:
Trisha Smith
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase's Disability Leave Policy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Beepot et al v. J. P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Beepot and Joanne Beepot
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al v. Marquez
as 1:2009cv22873
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Defendant:
Michael A. Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
