Cases 31 - 40 of 765
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
BROWN, EARNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA HARRIS and J. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINOR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
JAMAR KENNETH MINOR
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, J. EARNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
J. JACKSON, M. SOMMERS and T. SOLOMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv02170
Plaintiff:
DERRIOUS MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS REGALE, FOX, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
