Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jamison v. Winston Choctaw County Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Deputy Warden Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jamison v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2021cv00014
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
as 4:2020cv00214
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Jamison
Respondent:
Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
CMCF Medical Department, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jamison v. King
as 3:2020cv00552
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jamison et al v. Central Mississippi Correction Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Central Mississippi Correction Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison and Christopher Powell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. King
as 3:2020cv00020
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Hood
as 3:2018cv00207
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Attorney General Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00172
Petitioner:
Micheal Jamison
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Celeste Wilson and Mark Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
