Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jenkins v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00331
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Bryan N Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mihaylo et al v. Russell-Jenkins et al
as 3:2018cv08004
Respondent:
Shane Russell-Jenkins, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Amy Fackrell and others
Petitioner:
Emily Noelle Mihaylo and James Joseph Knochel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Yavapai County Superior Court
as 3:2018cv08002
Petitioner:
James Edward Jenkins
Respondent:
Yavapai County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00256
Petitioner:
Brian C Jenkins
Respondent:
JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins #034382 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02254
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Jenkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins #034382 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02199
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Jenkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00472
Petitioner:
Randy Jenkins
Respondent:
Craig Apker, Harley G Lappin, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00500
Petitioner:
Monte Eugene Jenkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Valiz et al
as 4:2010cv00223
Petitioner:
Junies A Jenkins
Respondent:
Gilbert Valiz, Charles Harrington, Joseph Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00533
Plaintiff:
Junies A. Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Arizona District Court, Susan R Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
