Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
English v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01141
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ms. Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tanya L. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crinel v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01099
Respondent:
Mr. Lopez, Jenkins, Ms. Haywood and others
Petitioner:
Lisa A Crinel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01065
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Issac, Jenkins and others
Petitioner:
Nakeisha Y Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00967
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Jenkins, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Julia Hollis Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nevers v. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2020cv00525
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Camp Administrator Jenkins
Petitioner:
Shawanda Nevers
Defendant:
Patrica Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 2:2017cv01951
Petitioner:
Antwon D Jenkins
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Larrie Jenkins
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Edward Ellington and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Ellington et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Larrie Jenkins
Defendant:
Edward Ellington and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
