Cases 1 - 10 of 59
JENKINS v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
ALAN W. JENKINS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, MERSHON, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
WESLEE MYKLE ROSS JENKINS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, DERRIK MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Bass et al
as 3:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Defendant:
Dorell Bass and Lanre Idowu
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JENKINS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
James Jenkins, III and James Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Redman et al
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Rayshawn Anthony Holloway and Rayshawn Holloway
Defendant:
Redman, Sheperd, Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00247
Petitioner:
James Jenkins, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Defendant:
Wheeler, Wolf and J Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Defendant:
Wheeler, Wolf and J Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00371
Petitioner:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
