Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Jenkins v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2016cv06645
Plaintiff:
Keith Jenkins
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00217
Petitioner:
Lee Roy Jenkins
Respondent:
Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spikes v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv03774
Defendant:
Leigh Ann Wall, Kevin Dotson Linder, Warren Ledoux Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Tanner
as 2:2015cv01891
Plaintiff:
Horace Jenkins
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2015cv01739
Plaintiff:
Darius Jenkins
Defendant:
Mike Tubbs and Ike Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2015cv00294
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell and Darrel Vannoy
Petitioner:
Quarion J. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson et al v. Gusman et al
as 2:2014cv02273
Plaintiff:
Philip Gibson, Mark Luzzo and Benito Castro
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman, Mitch Landrieu, Earl Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Smith
as 2:2014cv02230
Plaintiff:
Horace Jenkins
Defendant:
Seth Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. USA
as 6:2014cv00008
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Charles Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gage v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2013cv00638
Defendant:
Linden Franklin, Eric Hinyard, Unknown Jarvis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
