Cases 1 - 10 of 31,243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nance v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Ellean Nance
Defendant:
Latonya Hughes, C. Truitt and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettus et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01187
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Pettus and Deborah Pettus
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
