Cases 1 - 10 of 6,198
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Negrete-Neal v. Luraschi et al
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
Rheta Negrete-Neal
Defendant:
Anthony Luraschi, Apperson Crump, PLC, Timothy Ginski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02281
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.58.165.14
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.58.165.14
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
