Cases 1 - 10 of 4,337
McColl v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
James John McColl
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loop v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
John Torsten Loop
Defendant:
State of Washington, JAMS Mediation Arbitration and ADR Services and Helen L Halpert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Goguen et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Ryan Adam Dixon
Defendant:
Jie Liang Goguen and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fungi Perfecti LLC et al v. JT Best Deals LLC
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Fungi Perfecti LLC and Turtle Bear Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JT Best Deals LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hartzell v. Insight Global LLC
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
John Hartzell
Defendant:
Insight Global, LLC
Antic v. Trident Seafoods Corporation
as 2:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Ranko Antic
Defendant:
Trident Seafoods Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Pickering v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
John Pickering
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Foodservicedirect.com Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
