Cases 11 - 20 of 2,034
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Johnson
Defendant:
Galipeau, Jones and Arnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. REVLON, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
KELLY SCOTT
Defendant:
REVLON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., SOFT SHEEN-CARSON, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Sharon Johnson
Defendant:
Neighborhood Health and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
COLLINS v. MCPHEARSON et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
IRA LEE COLLINS
Defendant:
MCPHEARSON, MILLER and JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FITCH et al
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTT FITCH, TINA LEE and GEO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
