Cases 1 - 10 of 1,888
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Medical Staff RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Russell Odell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff RRJ, Security Staffing RRJ and Dr. Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Kelvin Johnson, Brandon Houston and Taurian Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Javaun Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson, William Diehl, Kevin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sony Pictures Inc.
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Johnson
Defendant:
Sony Pictures Inc. doing business as Crunchyroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Johnson v. The Unites States of America
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Victor Johnson
Defendant:
The United States of America and Yakubu Ali Balogun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
