Cases 1 - 10 of 3,168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03413
Plaintiff:
Christine Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner:
Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Markel American Insurance Company v. Ulanski et al
as 1:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jason Ulanski, Eliasard Alcauter, Jacob Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Jones v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03298
Plaintiff:
Lanita Jones
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen- Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Freddrina Mae Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones
as 1:2024cv03168
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
