Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan Pile Driving, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jordan Pile Driving, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Marine-Exoneration from/or Limitation of Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Kaczmarczyk v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Kaczmarczyk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1382 Eligibility for Benefits
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jordan et al v. USAS General Idemnity Company
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ricki Jordan and John Jordan
Defendant:
USAS General Idemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
