Cases 51 - 60 of 996
Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.In re: Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.
as 23-2303
Appellant:
In re: STRONGBRIDGE DUBLIN LTD.
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
PenIn re: Pen
as 23-2282
Appellant:
In re: THE PEN
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
ABUGATTAS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA ABUGATTAS, ELIZABETH ANDERSON, WILLIAM BARRY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FRY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRY, CHRISTOPHER S. GILL, BROOKE A. GILL and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Beavis v. US
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
HOLLIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01165
Petitioner:
RODNEY K. HOLLIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HOFFMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
BRENDA K. HOFFMAN, FRANCIS JOSEPH HOFFMAN and BRENDA K. MUNDY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Alonso v. Quan
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUAN, POLI FLORES, (NFN) ROSS and others
HUGHES et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
CHARLES K. HUGHES and JANET W. HUGHES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
R.S. Lipman Brewing Company, LLCIn re: R.S. Lipman Brewing Company, LLC
as 23-2131
Appellant:
In re: R.S. LIPMAN BREWING COMPANY, LLC
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
