Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Cornette v. Altepeter et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Cornette
Defendant:
L. Altepeter, N. Sailer and Matt Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Massey v. Spaan et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Massey, Jr.
Defendant:
Micheal Robin Spaan, Philip R. Volland and Micheal L. Wolverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Warren Wolfe Esq. and The Staff at Rex L. Butler & Asso.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael L. McMillian
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Hooper v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Marjorie L. Hooper
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Williams v. Anchorage School District et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Defendant:
Anchorage School District, Alaska Department of Corrections, Stephen C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boudreau v. Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brenda L Boudreau
Defendant:
Anchorage Police Department, Municipality of Anchorage and Bronson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minter v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Denise L. Minter
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moen v. Satterberg et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Daniel-William Moen
Respondent:
Daniel T. Satterberg, Julia Garratt, Ketu Shah and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
