Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LI v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv04749
Defendant:
Atty General MERRICK B. GARLAND, Director UR M. JADDOU, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Plaintiff:
SHUI MING LI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lin v. Skotleski et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Defendant:
William Skotleski, Brian Konopka, Anthony Doblovasky and others
Plaintiff:
Li Zhuo Lin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
JIANG v. YUAN
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
LI YUAN, LIU YUAN, PUBLIC SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF BAISE CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ACORN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CO. v. ACORN INDUSTRIAL INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04780
Plaintiff:
ACORN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CO.
Defendant:
ACORN INDUSTRIAL INC. and DELIANG LI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
