Cases 31 - 40 of 122
(PC) Howell v. Baker et al
as 2:2020cv01210
Defendant:
Z. Lujan, W. Sampley, J. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Howell v. Banvelos et al
as 2:2020cv00801
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, W. Sampley, J. Banvelos and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez et al v. Adtalem Education Group, Inc. formerly known as DeVry Education Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04079
Plaintiff:
Vince Robinson, Wesley Lisska, Marcos Arroyo and others
Defendant:
DeVry University, Inc., DTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION INC. formerly known as DEVRY EDUCATION GROUP, INC., Adtalem Education Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pedro Lujan Grajiola Jr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv02481
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Pedro Lujan Grajiola, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manuel Duron Lujan v. City of Whittier et al
as 2:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Corcoran, Robert, Montero and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Duron Lujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anna Lujan v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2018cv05283
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Anna Lujan
Christopher A. Ballew v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2018cv00712
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Ballew
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer Lerry Esparza and others
Rhodes v. City Of Fresno, et al.
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Percy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
City Of Fresno , Lennie Lujan , Michael McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhodes v. City Of Fresno et al
as 1:2017at00987
Plaintiff:
Percy Rhodes
Defendant:
City Of Fresno , Lennie Lujan , Michael McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniel Avila v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2017cv02701
Defendant:
Patrick Allen, Patrick Allen, Brian Alley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
