Cases 1 - 10 of 733
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Lynn L. Neeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bromaghim v. Ligon
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Bromaghim
Defendant:
Lee Ann Ligon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Dickerson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Jaime Lynn Dickerson
Defendant:
United States of America and Raquel Lilian Evans
Bates v. Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Bates
Defendant:
Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jackson v. Messer Franchises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Messer Franchises LLC, Lynn Messer Hawkins and Paul Messer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perry v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Angela Perry cor. sole. doing business as Infinite Ascension Express Trust
Defendant:
Reginald B. Scandrett, Stephen N. Knights, Jr., Pamela Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
