Cases 1 - 10 of 554
Dawson v. Manhattan Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Carl Dawson
Defendant:
Manhattan Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, LPN Sharon Martin, RN Sherry McCarver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Washington v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. City of Poplarville, MS
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Bert Martin
Defendant:
City of Poplarville, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson et al v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Johnson and Danario Slack
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martin Real Estate & Rental, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Martin Real Estate & Rental, LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Xome, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Scott v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shira Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Deborah Anne Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Giutta v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Toby A. Giutta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
