Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Major v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv06291
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. California and the Screen Actors Guild of America et al
as 5:2024cv06242
Defendant:
Kathleen Weese, The Sheriffs offices of Santa Clara County CA, California and the Screen Actors Guild of America and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Major v. U. S. Marine Corp. et al
as 5:2024cv06164
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
U. S. Marine Corp. and Google.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BMO Bank N.A. v. Singh
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Major Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davenport v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00985
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Justin Major Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Major v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv03199
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Google.com
Plaintiff:
Matthew Benjamin Major
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. McVege et al
as 5:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
McVege, Bravo, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravenwood-Productions LLC et al v. David Ozer
as 2:2024cv03532
Plaintiff:
Ravenwood-Productions LLC and Kevin V Duncan
Defendant:
David Ozer, Strong Studios, Inc., Mark Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Legaspy Chacon v. Majors
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy Chacon
Respondent:
Barbara Lee Majors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Major Samy I. Cano v. Department of Defense
as 5:2024mc00007
Petitioner:
Major Samy I. Cano and Major Samy I. Cano - DLOG
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
