Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Timothy MarrIn re: Timothy Marr
as 24-10151
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY ALAN MARR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
MARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34979
Plaintiff:
KYLE MARR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marr v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv18396
Plaintiff:
Michael Marr and Michael L Marr
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mckeehan Souza et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv12269
Plaintiff:
Julie Mckeehan Souza and Donna Mckeehan-Marr
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy Marr v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14200
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALAN MARR
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
MARR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11977
Plaintiff:
DOUGALS AUSTIN MARR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. EBBERT et al
as 5:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN EBBERT, UNKNOWN SW, COUNSELOR MARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
