Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Piatt v. May
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Kyle C. Piatt
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04182
Plaintiff:
Brandon May
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mays v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Brian Mays
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Welltok, Inc. and Premier Health Partners d/b/a Premier Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sands v. May
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Sands
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. May
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Larry D. Stewart
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03817
Plaintiff:
Michael May and Samantha May
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodrich v. City of Marion, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Donald Goodrich
Defendant:
City of Marion, Ohio, Austin Ray, Nicholas Kalb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnette v. May
as 4:2023cv02027
Petitioner:
Lorenza Barnette
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
David F. Welch
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
