Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Mills v. May
as 5:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Brandon May
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
as 5:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MAY
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc, Bridgestone Corporation, Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Taquashone Ray
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Village of Buckeye Lake et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Michael Hudson, II
Defendant:
Village of Buckeye Lake, Buckeye Lake Police Department, Bradley Nicodemus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Piatt v. May
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Kyle C. Piatt
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04182
Plaintiff:
Brandon May
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
