Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Morton v. Bradley M. Trate
as 22-1837
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MORTON
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, D. GONZALEZ, JR. and BRADLEY TRATE
Anthony Martin v. Timothy Redden, et al
as 21-1937
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL TIBBLES, HOWARD MORTON, RHONDA BRENNA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Thomas Powers v. David Marcowitz, et al
as 20-1252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MARCOWITZ, Doctor, JENNIFER BLAESING and JAMES MORTON
Jerome Williams v. Ron Neal, et al
as 17-2001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON NEAL and HOWARD MORTON
Dennis Scott v. James Morton, et al
as 16-3908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MORTON, JASON MOODY and JOSHUA CLEAVINGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Felder v. Bruce Lemmon, et al
as 16-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. FELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE LEMMON, BILL WILSON, Superintendent, HOWARD MORTON and others
Cheryl Lamkins, et al v. Dressbarn, Incorporated, et al
as 15-3373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL B. LAMKINS and MORTON A. SEGALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DRESSBARN, INCORPORATED, ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INCORPORATED, ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cheryl Lamkins, et al v. Dressbarn, Incorporated, et al
as 15-3369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL B. LAMKINS and MORTON A. SEGALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DRESSBARN, INCORPORATED, ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INCORPORATED, ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INCORPORATED and others
Franklin Elmore v. James Morton, et al
as 15-2097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN ELMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MORTON, Security Therapy Aid and CANDY ANDERSON, Security Therapy Aid
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
