Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RANDOLPH v. COPS MONITORING et al
as 1:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
ATTALIA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
LYDIA SECURITY MONITORING, INC. D/B/A C.O.P.S. MONITORING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427 et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427, KASHIF CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT CHARLES CARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JACQUELINE DUNN, MAYOR JAMES KENNEY and others
Fenner v. Lehigh Valley Health Network
as 3:2021cv00075
Defendant:
Lehigh Valley Health Network d/b/a Lehigh Valley Hospital - Pocono
Plaintiff:
Randolph S. Fenner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RANDOLPH v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 2:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
TIAESHA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
VORHIES v. RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
CAROL VORHIES
Defendant:
RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
EMERY v. MACK TRUCKS, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv02828
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH EMERY
Defendant:
MACK TRUCKS, INC. and UAW LOCAL 677
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
SIMMONS v. LMS INTELLIBOUND, INC.
as 5:2012cv03908
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
LMS INTELLIBOUND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2010cv01124
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VANESSA RANDOLPH and CHARLES FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ARMBUSTER et al v. F.L. SMIDTH INC.
as 2:2007cv00578
Plaintiff:
DONALD ARMBUSTER, ANGEL AYALA, WILLIAM CONDO and others
Defendant:
F.L. SMIDTH INC. and F.L. SMIDTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
