Cases 41 - 50 of 374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
MARTIN v. WHITE
as 1:2021cv16636
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RANDOLPH MARTIN
Defendant:
D. K. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JUSTICE, II v. CORE-MARK HOLDING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03584
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
CORE-MARK HOLDING COMPANY, INC., SCOTT E MCPHERSON, ROCKY DEWBRE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Lawrence v. Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01158
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Stuart W. Booth, Rocky Dewbre and others
Kreuser v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Philipp Adrian Kreuser
Defendant:
Randolph L. Howard, Cynthia J. Warner, Jeffrey Stroburg and others
Nominal Defendant:
Renewable Energy Group, Inc.
JONES v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03314
Plaintiff:
DANITA JONES
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, SMART SALES AND LEASE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stephens et al v. Lin et al
as 3:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephens and Wendy Stephens
Defendant:
Hongyu Lin and Lin Trading Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Justice, II v. MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02844
Defendant:
WALTER J ASPATORE, JOSEPH D GAREA, RANDOLPH C PASCHKE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv11962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427 et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427, KASHIF CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT CHARLES CARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JACQUELINE DUNN, MAYOR JAMES KENNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
