Cases 1 - 10 of 862
(HC) Robinson v. Pettijohn
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Gareth Warren Robinson
Respondent:
Lindy Pettijohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
Phillipe Silva, Quines, III, Sgt. Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Maron Robinson v. J. Rupp et al
as 2:2024cv02843
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
J. Rupp, A. Moreno, E. Rojo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Payton v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
H. Robinson, C. Cabatic, D. Tabbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Defendant:
Dr. Robinson, Amanda Allred, Dons Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Bean
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Robinson
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mayes v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison Warden, Tony Moua, C. Elston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mayes v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison Warden, Tony Moua, C. Elston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Taylor, et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Jr., J. Carey, J. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dulgov
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Nadine Nzeuga Robinson
Respondent:
A. Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
