Cases 31 - 40 of 278
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Spurlock et al
as 2:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Albert D Young
Defendant:
Dewayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder v. Robinson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00695
Plaintiff:
Joshua Crowder
Defendant:
Warden Robinson, Officer Coats and Officer Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Robinson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lewis Edwards
Defendant:
Christian Robinson, Brittany Marshall and Clevon Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Dean et al
as 5:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Tion Robinson
Defendant:
J. Blake Dean, Madison Morgan Stac Team, Huntsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Dyette et al
as 5:2021cv01060
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Michael Dyette, Sean Stacy, Files and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isler v. Esties et al
as 5:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Isler, Jr
Defendant:
Wayne Esties, Prem Kumar Gulati, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surles v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Limestone Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Thompkins et al
as 4:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Steve Thompkins, B Robinson, Lt. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Edward Dana Robinson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
