Cases 11 - 20 of 99
O'Neill v. Beauty Lab and Laser et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
GAVIN O'NEILL
Defendant:
BEAUTY LAB AND LASER LLC, HEATHER GAY, ANDREA ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Johnson et al v. Bowles et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Kent Johnson, Joshua Peterson, Grace Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Bryan Bowles, Cynthia Phillips, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Howell et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Roy
Defendant:
Doug Howell, Shaun Lott, Zac Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gill et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Eric Ison Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Sim Gill, Brett Robinson and Tyson V. Hamilton
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Newey et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Mikel Ray Brown and Mikel Brown
Defendant:
Reid Newey, John Robison, Blake Haycock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. 7PN et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Jeffrey Green and 7PN
Plaintiff:
Cari Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KRG Draper Peaks v. Strollerdepot.com et al
as 2:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Rustin Craig Morris, Dallas Robinson, Rustin Morris and others
Plaintiff:
KRG Draper Peaks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Geico General Insurance et al
as 2:2020cv00328
Plaintiff:
Sean Robinson
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance and Geico Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
